Sedikit Info Seputar
performance for different file systems and slice_sync in Froyo
Terbaru 2017
- Hay gaes kali ini team Info Symbian and Android, kali ini akan membahas artikel dengan judul performance for different file systems and slice_sync in Froyo, kami selaku Team Info Symbian and Android telah mempersiapkan artikel ini untuk sobat sobat yang menyukai Info Symbian and Android. semoga isi postingan tentang
Artikel comparison,
Artikel ext2,
Artikel ext4,
Artikel file system,
Artikel galaxy S,
Artikel I9000,
Artikel performance,
Artikel slice_async,
Artikel slice_sync,
Artikel speed,
Artikel tweaks, yang saya posting kali ini dapat dipahami dengan mudah serta memberi manfa'at bagi kalian semua, walaupun tidak sempurna setidaknya artikel kami memberi sedikit informasi kepada kalian semua. ok langsung simak aja sob
Judul:
Berbagi Info Seputar
performance for different file systems and slice_sync in Froyo
Terbaru
link: performance for different file systems and slice_sync in Froyo
Berbagi performance for different file systems and slice_sync in Froyo Terbaru dan Terlengkap 2017
performed some tests days before and I would like to share the results with all of you. the result was as expected (my expectation)the test was conducted on /dbdata, using dd to read and write, and with different slice_sync and slice_async values.
According to lwn.net:
- slice_sync: How many msec a sync disk slice lasts
- slice_async: How many msec an async disk slice lasts
in froyo, the default value for slice_sync is 97, and slice_async is 39. while in eclair, they are 100 and 40 respectively.
and, the results were obtained by the average value under different file systems as below:
write: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dbdata/test count=25000 (using default bs=512)
read: dd if=/dbdata/test of=/dev/null
test1: default slice_sync (97), slice_async (39)
ext2 w=0.3563576, r=0.2172932
ext4 w=1.7057048, r=0.1286368
ext2 on ext4 w=0.2786272, r=0.1360666
ext2 on ext4 noatime nodiratime w=0.279215, r=0.124138
ext4 on ext2 w=0.4299866, r=0.1277804
test2: slice_sync (50), slice_async (20)
ext2 w=0.3883144,r=0.2209398
ext4 - omitted
ext2 on ext4 w=0.2743988,r=0.1343098
ext4 on ext2 w=0.4350612,r=0.2513572
test3: slice_sync (500), slice_async (200)
ext2 w=0.4159796, r=0.40419
ext4 - omitted
ext2 on ext4 - omitted
ext4 on ext2 w=0.4252074, r=0.2614818
obviously, the fastest one was ext2 on top of ext4, with only insignificant impact with noatime and nodiratime options (i cant believe it). this combination of file systems performed well as expected since while ext2 do somewhat like "blind read/write", the ext4 will hold the data b4 commit (PLS, pls dont argue ext2 and ext4 with me and that's why i described them very roughly...
)actually this was just for my own leasure but i think it may be useful to u guys as well so i decided to post it here for your ref
more info
